Approach
We invest where we have conviction in the science, the development path, the business, and the ROI potential.
01Evaluation framework
Four lenses, applied to every opportunity.
01
Science
Does it work, and how do we know?
- Is the mechanism plausible and supported by data of adequate quality?
- What evidence would change our view?
- What is genuinely new, and what is defensible?
02
Development
What stands between here and a product?
- What is the regulatory pathway, and what does it require?
- How much time and capital reach the next value-inflecting milestone?
- What are the clinical, manufacturing and quality hurdles?
03
Business
Who adopts it, and who pays?
- Who is the user, who is the buyer, and are they the same?
- How does reimbursement or budget ownership work?
- What do customers use today, and why would they switch?
04
Investment
Is this a good investment at this price?
- Is the entry valuation reasonable for the milestones this round funds?
- What does the financing path — and dilution — look like?
- Who could plausibly acquire or finance the company later?
02Principles
How we hold ourselves accountable.
- Mechanism before narrative
- If we cannot explain why a product should work, we do not invest — however compelling the story.
- Risks written down
- Every memo includes a structured risk analysis. Investors should see the reasons for caution alongside the reasons for conviction.
- Price matters
- A good company at the wrong price can be a poor investment. We evaluate entry valuation against what the round actually funds.
- Deal by deal
- Investors choose each investment individually. No blind pools, no pressure to participate.
- No projected returns
- We discuss outcome scenarios and comparable transactions. We do not publish return projections.
03Focus
What we invest in.
- Therapeutics
- Programs where the biology, modality and development path can be reasoned about explicitly — and where the next milestone is fundable.
- Medical devices
- Devices with a clear clinical workflow, a credible regulatory pathway and a buyer who can be identified by name.
- Diagnostics
- Tests where analytical performance, clinical utility and reimbursement can each be evidenced, not assumed.
- Life-science tools
- Instruments, reagents and platforms that change what researchers and developers can measure or make.
- Healthcare technology
- Software and services that fit how care is actually delivered, purchased and paid for.
- Adjacent technologies
- Technologies at the edge of biology — where scientific understanding is the main source of advantage.
04Process
From first meeting to closed SPV.
01Source
Opportunities come through founders, co-investors and angel networks. We look at many and pursue few.
02Diligence
Scientific, development, commercial and team diligence, conducted directly with management and, where useful, domain experts.
03Memo
A written investment memo sets out the thesis, the evidence and the risks — including the ones that argue against investing.
04Syndicate
Eligible investors review the memo, the diligence materials and an investor webinar with the company before deciding.
05Close
Each investment is made through a dedicated SPV. Subscriptions and funds are handled by a third-party SPV administrator.
06Report
SPV investors receive company updates as they become available.
See how the framework is applied in practice.
View investments